Humoral Responses Following SARSCoV- 2 Vaccination in Patients with Commonly Used Immunosuppressants in Neuromuscular Disorders

Background: Disease-specific studies have reported impaired humoral responses after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disorders (IMIDs) treated with specific immunosuppressants and immunomodulating agents. The objective of this study is to investigate the humoral immune response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients using immunosuppressive and immunomodulating mono- and combination therapies, focussing on frequently prescribed therapies for inflammatory neuromuscular diseases. Methods: National prospective observational cohort study in selected patients with prevalent IMIDs including neuromuscular disease, and immunosuppressive or immunomodulating monotherapy (n=1273), combination therapies (n=419), patients without immunosuppressants (n=473), and healthy controls (n=174). Anti-RBD IgG responses and neutralisation capacity were monitored following standard vaccination regimens and a three-vaccination regimen in subgroups. Hybrid immune responses, i.e. vaccination after previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, were studied as a proxy for recall responses. Findings: Sera from 1869 participants without and 470 participants with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection were analysed. We included 168 (7 2%) patients with inflammatory neuropathies and myopathies, and 127 (5 4%) patients with myasthenia gravis. Humoral responses did not differ between disorders. Anti-CD20 therapy and mycophenolate mofetil combined with corticosteroids were associated with lower relative risks (RR) for reaching seroconversion following standard vaccination (RR: 0 32 and 0 61 respectively). The monotherapies corticosteroids, purine antagonists, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil and IVIg were not associated with a lower RR for reaching seroconversion (RR: 0 97, 0 98, 1 01, 0 86, and 0 99, respectively). Similarly, corticosteroids combined with either methotrexate or purine antagonists was not associated with a lower RR for reaching seroconversion (RR 0 89). A third vaccination increased seroconversion for mycophenolate mofetil combination treatments but not for anti-CD20 therapies. Most immunosuppressant groups showed moderately reduced antibody titres after standard vaccination that, in subgroups, did not increase after a third vaccination, although seroconversion rates and neutralisation capacity were unaffected. In participants with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were boosted after vaccination, regardless of immunosuppressive treatment. Interpretation: Humoral responses following vaccination are impaired by specific immunosuppressants, most relevant for neuromuscular diseases being anti-CD20 and mycophenolate mofetil combination treatments. After standard vaccination regimens most immunosuppressants show equal seroconversion to controls although antibody titres may be moderately reduced. As neutralisation capacity and recall responses are also preserved in these patients, this is not likely to translate in loss of (short term) protection. Alternatively, in immunosuppressants showing poor humoral responses after standard vaccination regimens such as, a third vaccination resulted in additional seroconversion in mycophenolate mofetil combination treatments whereas the effect for anti-CD20 therapy was limited.

Disease Activity after SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and Infection in Patients with Immune-Mediated Neuromuscular Diseases

Importance: Viral infection or vaccination has the potential to increase disease activity in immune-mediated neuromuscular diseases. Objective: We aimed to evaluate whether SARSCoV- 2 vaccination and infection leads to increase of disease activity in patients with immune-mediated neuromuscular diseases. Methods: This is an interim analysis of a subset of patients from an ongoing prospective multi-center cohort study on SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with various immune mediated inflammatory diseases in the Netherlands, the Target to-B!-COVID study (T2B!). Patients received digital questionnaires every two months from study entry to assess disease activity compared to previous visit using a 5-point Likert scale. In addition, in case of SARS CoV-2 infection (prior to vaccination) patients received an extra questionnaire to assess disease activity in the four weeks after infection. In cases of self-reported increase of disease activity, medical files were used to assess whether disease activity was reported by the treating physician, and whether changes were made in type or dose of immunosuppressive or immunomodulating treatment. Results: In total, we included 303 patients with immune-mediated neuromuscular disease of which 127 patients with inflammatory neuropathies, 133 patients with myasthenia gravis, and 43 patients with myositis. In the four months after completed vaccination, 67 (22.1%) patients indicated an increase in disease activity, of which 62 (93%) was reported as worse and 5 (7%) as much worse. In 10 (3.3%) of the cases with self-reported increase, disease activity was also reported by the treating physician in the medical chart. In 4 (1.3%) of patients with self-reported increase disease activity treatment was adjusted because of the increase in disease activity. A SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to vaccination occurred in 24 (8%) patients, from which 3 (12.5%) indicated an increase in disease activity, not leading to change in treatment. Conclusion: Increase of disease activity after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination or infection was reported infrequently, and was self-limiting in most cases. Findings from our cohort may help physicians in neuromuscular disease to adequately inform patients on the risk of increased disease activity due to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination or infection. Full and verified results will be reported at the ICNMD 2022.

Longitudinal humoral response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in ocrelizumab treated MS patients: To wait and repopulate?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to measure humoral responses after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in MS patients treated with ocrelizumab (OCR) compared to MS patients without disease modifying therapies (DMTs) in relation to timing of vaccination and B-cell count. METHODS: OCR treated patients were divided into an early and a late group (cut-off time 12 weeks between infusion and first vaccination). Patients were vaccinated with mRNA-1273 (Moderna). B-cells were measured at baseline (time of first vaccination) and SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were measured at baseline, day 28, 42, 52 and 70. RESULTS: 87 patients were included (62 OCR patients, 29 patients without DMTs). At day 70, seroconversion occurred in 39.3% of OCR patients compared to 100% of MS patients without DMTs. In OCR patients, seroconversion varied between 26% (early group) to 50% (late group) and between 27% (low B-cells) to 56% (at least 1 detectable B-cell/µL). CONCLUSIONS: Low B-cell counts prior to vaccination and shorter time between OCR infusion and vaccination may negatively influence humoral response but does not preclude seroconversion. We advise OCR treated patients to get their first vaccination as soon as possible. In case of an additional booster vaccination, timing of vaccination based on B-cell count and time after last infusion may be considered.

Reduced humoral immune response after BNT162b2 coronavirus disease 2019 messenger RNA vaccination in cancer patients under antineoplastic treatment.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients are at a higher risk of developing severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients undergoing treatment remain unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this interventional prospective multicohort study, priming and booster doses of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine were administered 21 days apart to solid tumor patients receiving chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted or hormonal therapy, and patients with a hematologic malignancy receiving rituximab or after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Vaccine safety and efficacy (until 3 months post-booster) were assessed. Anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) receptor-binding domain (RBD) antibody levels were followed over time (until 28 days after the booster) and in vitro SARS-CoV-2 50% neutralization titers (NT50) toward the wild-type Wuhan strain were analyzed 28 days after the booster. RESULTS: Local and systemic adverse events (AEs) were mostly mild to moderate (only 1%-3% of patients experienced severe AEs). Local, but not systemic, AEs occurred more frequently after the booster dose. Twenty-eight days after the booster vaccination of 197 cancer patients, RBD-binding antibody titers and NT50 were lower in the chemotherapy group {234.05 IU/ml [95% confidence interval (CI) 122.10-448.66] and 24.54 (95% CI 14.50-41.52), respectively} compared with healthy individuals [1844.93 IU/ml (95% CI 1383.57-2460.14) and 122.63 (95% CI 76.85-195.67), respectively], irrespective of timing of vaccination during chemotherapy cycles. Extremely low antibody responses were seen in hematology patients receiving rituximab; only two patients had RBD-binding antibody titers necessary for 50% protection against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (<200 IU/ml) and only one had NT50 above the limit of detection. During the study period, five cancer patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection, including a case of severe COVID-19 in a patient receiving rituximab, resulting in a 2-week hospital admission. CONCLUSION: The BNT162b2 vaccine is well-tolerated in cancer patients under active treatment. However, the antibody response of immunized cancer patients was delayed and diminished, mainly in patients receiving chemotherapy or rituximab, resulting in breakthrough infections.

The Electro-Anatomical Pathway for Normal and Abnormal ECGs in COVID Patients

Patients with COVID-19 frequently have non-typical ECG changes in the QRS and T-wave morphology. The novel CineECG uses using the mean temporal spatial isochrones (mTSI) to relate the activation and recovery pathway to the cardiac anatomy. The aim of this feasib ility study is to use the novel CineECG to separate normal from abnormal ECGs. The ECGs of 100 normal controls were used to obtain the normal mTSI paths values for the QRS, ST segment and T-wave. These normal CineECG values were used to classify the COVID-19 ECGs as either as normal or abnormal of 107 patients being treatedfor COVID-19 in the University Medical Center Utrecht. The CineECG was able to classify 98% of the normal ECG correctly and 94% of the abnormal ECG in comparison to expert ECG classifications. The ability of the CineECG to relate the ECG to the cardiac anatomy supports the detection of abnormal ECGs. The CineECG might be a novel ECG screening tool to detect potential cardiac involvement of the COVID-19 disease for non-ECG experts. © 2020 Creative Commons;the authors hold their copyright.

Ambulatory follow-up care and monitoring of cancer patients during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic by collecting blood samples at home and monitoring systemic therapy using a smartphone application (COREO-trial)

Background: There is a broad range of clinical presentations of a SARS-CoV-2 viral infection varying from asymptomatic, sensation of a mild cold or flu to severe bilateral pneumonia and death. Liang et al. already reported the most severe complications in cancer patients particularly when they had undergone chemotherapy or surgery over the last month. In absence of a vaccine or adequate treatment of COVID-19 current measures to minimize the infectious risk of SARS-CoV-2 in a cancer patient population are focused on social distancing and protective measures for the medical and nursing staff members, and in some settings also patients. As it is clear that a hospital is a high risk setting to contract COVID-19, one of the strategies we can use to treat cancer patients as safe as possible, is to reduce hospital visits to a strict minimum. Trial design: The COREO-trial is a non-randomized cohort study at the Oncology unit of the Antwerp University Hospital (COVID-19 reference center) and AZ Maria Middelares Gent, both in Belgium. This trial contains two groups. Group A consists of patients that undergo outpatient monitoring (blood sampling at home and monitoring side effects using a smartphone application). Group B consists of patients that are in the classical hospital setting (= control group). The primary objective is to assess whether patients having home monitored oncologic treatment (cohort A) have a lower risk to the develop (severe) clinical COVID-19 compared to patients having classic in hospital oncologic treatment (cohort B). The working hypothesis is that interactive outpatient monitoring and management within the COREO-trial allows high quality cancer care with reduction of COVID-19 related complications. Legal entity responsible for the study: Antwerp University Hospital. Funding: Antwerp University Hospital. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.